Year-Round School
June 5, 2007 — Mr. KnoppIf what we are doing isn’t getting us where we want (or need) to go, I wonder why we keep doing it.
One has to wonder how we can think applying more pressure, raising the standards, increasing the amount of professional development (time taken out of the school day/year), adding curriculum pieces (Character educaiton looms as just one example of an increasing area of need.), increasing the amount of testing time (again time taken away from teaching) can bring about improved results.
It seems to me we are quickly approaching the place where educators could justifiably say, “What we are being asked to do just isn’t possible the way we are currently being asked to do it.”
Add to that the very different “product” that will be required in the work world in the 21st century “information/technology age”, and even I can grasp that something needs to change.
In my school I have been lobbying for more time with my students by suggesting we make adjustments in our school-day schedule, and I promise not to give up on that.
Now I have decided that will not be enough. Therefore, I am proposing that we enact a significant departure from “what we have always done.” I believe we now need to move to year-round school. Like it or not, there is no other way we can accomplish what we are being asked to accomplish. My idea of year-round school is an additional 45 days of student contact time. Those 45 days (perhaps some of the other 180 also) could (maybe even should) look very different from the current seat-time approach.
One thing I know–if what we are doing isn’t getting us where we want (or need) to go, we probably shouldn’t keep doing it.